Michael Krawczyk · Security Engineering · 18+ Years in the Field
Most breaches aren't sophisticated.
They're gaps nobody closed.
// Here's how I think about closing them — every environment, every time.
72K+
Vulns Remediated
93%
Patch Compliance
18+
Years in the Field
35
Clients Secured
S
Structure First
E
Expose the Gap
C
Correct at Root
U
Understand Risk
R
Reduce the Surface
E
Enforce & Verify
How I approach every environment I touch
S
Structure First — You Can't Secure a Disorganized Environment
The first thing I do in any engagement is establish structure. Clean group hierarchies, documented baselines, consistent configuration across all endpoints. Firewalls, MFA, encryption, hardening, patching. I've rebuilt this from scratch in environments that had none of it — and that foundation is what made every other improvement possible.
Prevent First
E
Expose the Gap — No Single Report Tells the Whole Story
I cross-reference multiple data sources because gaps hide in the spaces between them. Offline devices, broken agents, scanner drift — they all mask real risk. SIEM, EDR, FIM, IDS aren't checkboxes to me. They're the instruments I rely on daily. I've caught data integrity issues others missed entirely because I questioned what the numbers were actually telling me.
See Everything
C
Correct at Root — Closing a Ticket Is Not the Same as Recovery
When something gets through, the goal isn't just to restore service. It's to understand exactly why it happened and make sure it can't happen the same way again. Root cause analysis, defensible timelines, fixes that hold. I built an 8-stage script review pipeline specifically because untested fixes create new exposure. Recovery means it doesn't happen twice.
Fix It Right
U
Understand Risk — Not Every Gap Carries the Same Weight
Legacy systems, tight budgets, production windows — real environments rarely let you do it the textbook way. I triage, prioritize, and compensate where I can't fully remediate right now. Enhanced monitoring, dual authorization, WAFs. If you can't lock it down completely today, you cover it intelligently until you can. Risk management is a skill, not a disclaimer.
Adapt & Cover
R
Reduce the Surface — Less Exposure Means Less to Defend
Every unnecessary open port, unused service, or unlocked room is a liability someone else will eventually notice. I work to shrink the attack surface at every layer — network segmentation, least privilege access, physical controls. People forget the physical layer. Physical access to a server is game over, full stop. Reduction is a control, not an afterthought.
Shrink the Target
E
Enforce & Verify — If It Isn't Measured, It Isn't Managed
Policies without enforcement are just documents. I build processes that are repeatable, measurable, and auditable — SOPs, change management, vendor reviews, compliance baselines. Then I verify they're working: patch compliance trending, data integrity checks, report cross-validation. Culture and process are security controls. I've always treated them that way.
Set the Standard